W
Wildcard
Guest
Since the release of CMBS I have played mean games. Over that time I have noticed in my own personal opinion that CMBS is the least tactical title made by battlefront.
The reason for this view is that I feel the game is all about finding somewhere to set up that over looks a position and then just sit there and put rounds down range at anything that moves. I feel there is no tactics involved in this anyone can find some cover and rush over to it and sit there and wait.
Could the lack of tactics being involved be down to bad map design? i.e. yes the tend to be bigger than ww2 games but are very open.
So I have two question for you
1. Do you as a member feel that CMBS is a tactical game compared to the ww2 titles.
2. Why do you feel that it is or is not a tactical game.
The reason for this view is that I feel the game is all about finding somewhere to set up that over looks a position and then just sit there and put rounds down range at anything that moves. I feel there is no tactics involved in this anyone can find some cover and rush over to it and sit there and wait.
Could the lack of tactics being involved be down to bad map design? i.e. yes the tend to be bigger than ww2 games but are very open.
So I have two question for you
1. Do you as a member feel that CMBS is a tactical game compared to the ww2 titles.
2. Why do you feel that it is or is not a tactical game.