K
Kraut
Guest
Okay, fantastic!
I am going to start a new call for a second (parallel) 3vs3 match.
First participant is @Lethaface (but it would be great if you would agree to still be available as reserve player for the first match if necessary?)
@VonPlutz, would you agree? (but it would be great if you would agree to still be available as reserve player for the first match if necessary?)
I (@Kraut) would be available as a FC, but would withdraw if there are more than 6 players interested to play.
Any more players ready to start please let me know.
I am going to start a new call for a second (parallel) 3vs3 match.
First participant is @Lethaface (but it would be great if you would agree to still be available as reserve player for the first match if necessary?)
@VonPlutz, would you agree? (but it would be great if you would agree to still be available as reserve player for the first match if necessary?)
I (@Kraut) would be available as a FC, but would withdraw if there are more than 6 players interested to play.
Any more players ready to start please let me know.
I don't think I can commit the way it deserves.
That's the thing, campaigns usually last months / a year or two.
Ok, so I assume reserve players need to fill spots for those that (temporarily) fall out due to RL battles? In itself I would say it can be interesting to play out such a thing over a longer period. Once going full steam I'd expect the workload to become less and more streamlined. I've had PBEMs in the past that went on quite a while (and remained interesting). But life doesn't always cooperate with such things, at least in my case lol.
yes still available.
I always like the idea of having a 'in game' avatar like a HQ unit named after a player (I do this from time to time in QB's). Once that avatar dies or is wounded they can no longer play and and second in command takes over.
I can command a tank platoon or something small like ATG platoon or even a FO (now I'm been silly).
I can command a tank platoon or something small like ATG platoon or even a FO (now I'm been silly).
V
VonPlutz
Guest
I'm still interested. May need a walk through over discord on how the shared file works.
I am limited to FI and FB.
Nice idea. It probably would force players to preserve their HQs a bit more than usual I guess, and up the immersion.
Have all CMx2 games, so FI/FB works for me.
O
olaf
Guest
Interested
Sure Kraut.
Count me in.
Whatever you need.
Count me in.
Whatever you need.
K
Kraut
Guest
Fantastic! If I read that correct (@Nathangun?) we have now 6 players together to start.
I have waited some days to see if there will be more players interested.
Players are: @VonPlutz, @Lethaface, @Gunner, @Nathangun, @olaf and @Kraut
I am sending you an invitation to a message group to discuss the details.
I have waited some days to see if there will be more players interested.
Players are: @VonPlutz, @Lethaface, @Gunner, @Nathangun, @olaf and @Kraut
I am sending you an invitation to a message group to discuss the details.
K
Kraut
Guest
The first 3vs3 battle has ended. I would like to thank @PhilM, @Gunner, @fivefivesix, @Buckykatt and @JP48 for proving that: 3vs3 battle do work, that they can be played with high turn ratio and provide a lot of teamwork and enjoyment.
It was our pleasure Herr Kraut.
A game well organized.
Prost :cheerso:
A game well organized.
Prost :cheerso:
H
hungry animals
Guest
I'm interested in being in a 3v3. How did the playback work out? Can I have the specifics of that please?