Hi all. I have FB and BS, as many of you know I play a lot of BS H2H, primarily RUs vs UKR (as trying to get a fun fight RUS vs US is hard). I play very little single player at all, mostly replaying scenarios I've already played H2H, just to try what-ifs. My brain refuses to commit to SP if I can possibly use the same time for H2H. Bizarre I know....
Thinking about getting off the fence and grabbing SF2 in the next 12 hours whilst its still 30% off. But the procrastinator in me asks:
- Outside the single player campaigns (which I wont play), and small scenarios (which I will play to learn forces, as well as older 'modern' weapon system capabilities vs BS), what is SF2 like for H2H out of the box?
Thanks all for reading this far.....!
Thinking about getting off the fence and grabbing SF2 in the next 12 hours whilst its still 30% off. But the procrastinator in me asks:
- Outside the single player campaigns (which I wont play), and small scenarios (which I will play to learn forces, as well as older 'modern' weapon system capabilities vs BS), what is SF2 like for H2H out of the box?
- Are there many balanced H2H scenarios, specifically Blue vs Red?
- For QBs, is it likely to be only 'fun' if Blue on Blue? I am considering the NATO module as it provides the greatest diversity of forces for potential H2H fun
- Is playing anything QB NATO vs Syrians 'fun' at all, or really un-fun for Syrians?
- Is playing anything QB irregulars/insurgents vs NATO 'fun' at all, or again mostly sucky for the non-NATO player?
Thanks all for reading this far.....!