We were talking about what science is, but now you are now distorting the subject by mentioning all kind of different things. So I'll answer in bullet post form.
If memory serves, science is suposed to proove something and then disproove it. Something along those lines.
mmm, no. Proving something is TRUE, followed by proof that the same something is FALSE, isn't very scientific (perhaps you were intending to say 'prove that the opposite is false'?).
Science is about many things, one important part of it is to establish a framework in which we can all agree something is TRUE or FALSE (or whether it isn't possible to prove either). This is why a statement backed up by solid scientific research according to a vetted methodology is valued more than a statement without similar repeatable validation as to why that statement is true.
What we are seing as far as Covid and man made climate change isn´t science.
Who is seeing that and based on that grounds? Just because you say it isn't science, it isn't?
From what position or knowledge do you feel that you can factually claim that it isn't science? (anyone can has an opinion). You haven't proven anything, not even reasoned anything. Do you read David Icke?
You just state it isn't science, and so we should believe you? While you seem to not even know what science is exactly
I'm not convinced.
It reminds more of a cult mentality, probally because it serves a money purpose. The result are fixed and are not to be questioned, and woe to him that dares question it (science)
Clearly you have been sleeping under a large rock, because almost half the world including the current US president has actually questioned things like climate change and Covid. Upon those challenges, came a lot of proof.
What we in fact see is people yelling 'there is no proof', but when the proof / research / facts are presented to them they don't even want to know about it. They choose to be ignorant.
There is plenty of evidence around: not only scientific research, everyone with half a brain can ascertain himself that the world is actually warming up and that people are actually dying of Covid-19. You just down want to see it. You choose to believe what you believe, that's fine. There is the saying ignorance is bliss.
And yes also among scientists there is corruption, they are humans after all.
But choosing to believe ALL climate scientists and ALL virologists, among others, are ALL in a BIG scheme to get your money and have created climate change and Covid-19 as their 'vehicles' for such a scheme: now that's quite an achievement.
What about those 1000 plus doctors in Germany that recently disagreed with the narrative, are they cookoos along with the other professors and doctors?
Yeah, what about m? What did they disagree with exactly? Do they say Covid-19 doesn't exist?
Apart from those 1.000, there are another 401.100 doctors in Germany. So they are all in the scheme and just 1000 came out?
You saw what MTK wrote about me earlier "virus denier" thats stigmatizing people.
Well you actually denied that Covid-19 exists, didn't you?
So what is the stigma in that he calls you a 'virus denier'?
Fact is, if the government would tell people that santa existed based on people receiving presents. Millions would probally believe it.
Now that isn't a 'fact', because that's not how facts work. However, I do agree with you that probably millions would believe it.
If something is probably true, it can't be a fact.