FOG Medieval: The Pot Luck Battles Joust (Concluded)

Status
Not open for further replies.
My games with @chiquichops are complete. It was Austrians vs Bretons.

1. wellsonian defeats chiquichops - 53-17. + 36.
2. wellsonian defeats chiquichops - 60-35. +25.

The first game I felt was a solid victory where I minimized mistakes (for once). The second game was weird, and luck on my part was the deciding factor. He just couldn't get a good dice roll when he needed one. Thanks to chiquichops for the very entertaining games.
 
41 -15 and 51-26. Both victories go to me.

Thanks for the games @Nelson1812. What was up with the light troops across the unpassable river? :)
 
Second result in: @olaf beats @Nelson1812 by +51% ... and having won both battles, @olaf gets 1 bonus point.

Meanwhile @Badger73 is in the process of giving me a sound beating in our Anglo-Irish vs Tatars battle... :oops: :2charge:

Pot Luck Joust 002b.jpg

SECOND ROUND BATTLES:
(Either player can set up the challenge)

Battle 1: @Badger vs @Rico - Winner:

Battle 2: @chiquichops vs @Wellsonian - Winner: @Wellsonian by 113 - 52 = +61% (won both battles: +2 points)

Battle 3: @olaf vs @Nelson1812 - Winner: @olaf by 92 - 41 = +51% (won both battles: +2 points)
 
Second Round concludes with a crushing victory for @Badger73 ... tying him for first place with @olaf on 3 points.

Pot Luck Joust 002c.jpg

SECOND ROUND BATTLES:
(Either player can set up the challenge)

Battle 1: @Badger vs @Rico - Winner: @Badger73 by 113 - 68 = +45% (won both battles: +2 points)

Battle 2: @chiquichops vs @Wellsonian - Winner: @Wellsonian by 113 - 52 = +61% (won both battles: +2 points)

Battle 3: @olaf vs @Nelson1812 - Winner: @olaf by 92 - 41 = +51% (won both battles: +2 points)
 
BTW, im playing the Rise of the Swiss beta and its just great! Very nice playing with guns again.
 
@Badger73 @chiquichops @olaf @@Nelson1812 @Wellsonian

QUICK NOTE TO ALL PLAYERS:

These Pot Luck Joust mirror battles are intended to be played at the SAME time, not one after the other -- players figuring how to play these armies on the fly.

If they are played one after the other, one player can gain unfair advantage and maximise his winning % (or reduce losing %) in second game with intel learned from 1st game.

Example:

Side A has a an inherent strength advantage over side B, which is apparent after playing the first battle, winning by say +25%.

If in second battle, the player taking Side A , looks at lessons learned from first battle and then applies those to maximise that advantage and wins by +45% as a result.


This could be inherently unfair and not in the spirit of this tourney.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom