@MOS:96B2P
In light of your past personal accusations that I am a Russian sympathizer and purveyor of Russian propaganda, yesterday I asked if you could provide any examples where I implicitly expressed my support for either side in this conflict or more specifically stated my support for any of Russia’s actions, or that I have included any factual errors in my postings. As a courtesy to a fellow FGM member if you could please do so, that would I think be only fair and appropriate would you not agree?
Regarding my convoluted syntax, yes I am more than aware that it can at times appeared tortured, but at 69 years of age I have resigned myself that I am unlikely capable of adopting a whole new style of writing to please the grammar police amongst us, and so I make no apologies. Perhaps it was my growing up and then working in various multilingual environments that has contributed to this way of writing, but it is what it is. So if any of my comments have not been understood because of it, please let me know what you are confused about and I will attempt to rephrase.
In the meantime I await your evidence.
Cheers!
In light of your past personal accusations that I am a Russian sympathizer and purveyor of Russian propaganda, yesterday I asked if you could provide any examples where I implicitly expressed my support for either side in this conflict or more specifically stated my support for any of Russia’s actions, or that I have included any factual errors in my postings. As a courtesy to a fellow FGM member if you could please do so, that would I think be only fair and appropriate would you not agree?
Regarding my convoluted syntax, yes I am more than aware that it can at times appeared tortured, but at 69 years of age I have resigned myself that I am unlikely capable of adopting a whole new style of writing to please the grammar police amongst us, and so I make no apologies. Perhaps it was my growing up and then working in various multilingual environments that has contributed to this way of writing, but it is what it is. So if any of my comments have not been understood because of it, please let me know what you are confused about and I will attempt to rephrase.
In the meantime I await your evidence.
Cheers!