First stop lying. Second, for the recordSo - assuming someone was Russian, based on the way they write, and then based on that assumption (which is in no way verified) accusing someone is pro-Russian and bashing him with rumors, anecdotes and unsubstantiated claims - is considered to be pushback? That is amusing.
And since I made a long sentence with a weird structure - am I now viable to be considered a Russian?
Stop lying. As I showed with facts HistoryLegends bias is deep into RU territory. So deep that it is pure propaganda. He lied what RU declared before the operation. He lied about LS attitude toward RU. He lied about abandoning SD and LS. The whole time I watched him he did not said any objective fact. Nothing.What bothers me is the ridiculous assumptions being made. Posting HistoryLegends is not anti-Ukrainian or pro-Russian. The channel itself is critical only of the reporting on the war, which at times has no connections with the reality. Similar trends of fantastical thinking exist on pro-Russian side, as well.
Are you going to feel bad about these RU old men?Instead of feeling bad about the fate of contract soldiers refusing to follow orders, you should feel bad about all the Ukrainian conscripts. Some of the reserve units being brought up to the front line appear to be manned by 45-50 year old men, who haven't seen military service for roughly 30 years.
I do feel bad for the Ukrainians who are forced, by the Russian initiated war, to go and defend their nation. Most would probably prefer to be at home with their families. It was uncomfortable sleeping in a foxhole at 18 YOA during peace time training. It's hard to imagine sleeping in a foxhole at 45 - 50 YOA during a real war. No doubt.Instead of feeling bad about the fate of contract soldiers refusing to follow orders, you should feel bad about all the Ukrainian conscripts. Some of the reserve units being brought up to the front line appear to be manned by 45-50 year old men, who haven't seen military service for roughly 30 years.
That's some interesting information. Thanks for the post. For those who do not know who Girken is I copied part of a Wiki and included the link below.First stop lying. Second, for the record
1. I stated fact - @Bones26 the guy who is pretending to be Canadian is in fact Russian (that is cold hard fact - no one except Russian-native can write such convoluted sentences following Russian rules. Full stop. If you do not like it, it does not mean it is not fact.) I asked him to openly admit that he is Russian and explain why he is pretending to be someone else (while posting RU propaganda video)
2. I stated fact - videos @Bones26 post are in fact blatant RU propaganda.
3. Neither you, nor @Bones26 refuted any of my facts. Non
4. Instead, you started to scream that it is propaganda, and the thread needs to be locked
5. I confronted you asking either to prove I am lying or admit that it is truth
6. You immediately run away
No, you are not an adult, and no, you cannot accept anything that threatens your internal world. That is cold hard fact from your behavior I described above.
Stop lying. As I showed with facts HistoryLegends bias is deep into RU territory. So deep that it is pure propaganda. He lied what RU declared before the operation. He lied about LS attitude toward RU. He lied about abandoning SD and LS. The whole time I watched him he did not said any objective fact. Nothing.
Now back to topic. Based on Girkin assessment (and few pieces from other RU guy) I prepared map of what is happening in last 24 hours in Donbass area, during so called 3rd Phase of RU operation. Let's he how it goes.
Nope, they are smart ones who choose where to enlist to avoid being drafted by Mobilization. When mobilizing they are not going to ask you anything - RU nationalist are telling that it is better to enlist now than to wait mobilization. Also, what about LDNR old, mobilized men?No, they are volunteers.
In your imagination maybe. You are a liar who knows nothing. Small quote regarding situation in Slyvansk (do not have time to do full translation).He also lost Slavyansk, proposed that militias pull back beyond Donetsk and Lugansk line, closer to the border. He is no longer affiliated with any decision making structure, and is mostly shunned.
It is known that the militia had two "Nones" [122mm SPG], the Czech and Givi, as the most powerful and mobile artillery means. Without them, it was almost impossible to hold or repel roadblocks or any other positions around the city. Without the regular supply of ammunition for these guns, there was no chance of somehow fighting outside the urban areas. And at the most critical moment, a convoy comes to Slavyansk from the "Mainland" [RU] along the "Road of Life", including with shells for "Nons". People are cheking, and there - yes, shells, that's just not the right ones at all. Tank or something else. But definitely not for the 120-mm self-propelled gun 2S9 "Nona". That's what I actually wanted to ask Strelkov [Girkin] about - what arrived and what role the lack of ammunition for the "Non" played in the surrender of the city. And Igor Ivanovich told me. Sorry, but I can't do without a separate paragraph in bold.
At the most critical moment, instead of ammunition for "Non", shells for 122-mm D-30 howitzers were sent to Slavyansk, of which the militia in Slavyansk did not have any.
The D-30s were only at Zakharchenko's, in Donetsk. And more or less serious artillery of Slyvansk defenders at this moment has finished . There were only two tanks left with a ridiculous number of shots. It was impossible to recapture and hold positions in the area of Nikolaevka without artillery.
Naturally, sabotage with the supply of ammunition for "Non" was not the only reason for the exit. There were several events and factors that influenced this moment.
Yes, I understand he is currently not part of the Russian government. However, he is a self-described Russian nationalist with a former leadership background in the Donbas area, Intelligence, etc. As such he has a very unique and interesting perspective. Understandably, as a Russian nationalist, he has a very strong bias in favor of all things Russian. He is not against the war but instead against the way it has been conducted (the Russian retreat from Kyiv etc.). He has no love for Ukraine or the West and is calling for a general mobilization of Russia to fight the war.He also lost Slavyansk, proposed that militias pull back beyond Donetsk and Lugansk line, closer to the border. He is no longer affiliated with any decision making structure, and is mostly shunned.
If only it were that straightforward @KuwaitIncubator but yes you are right to an extent... the fact that the Azov Regiment does have far right ideals certainly makes these black and white issues a little bit more grey.
a picture that sums up the whole thing. anything else is just details